Reload Request 老友互助補檔區

此區專為老友互助補檔之用,如錄影爆格、設備故障等等。
留言請自律,嚴禁惡意洗版等影響他人之行為。
發表無關留言會無預警BAN Account。
為方便大家清楚知道是「求」檔還是「補」檔,留言時敬請加 [tag]。
例如:[求] XXXXX S01E03 2012-12-12   |   [補] XXXXX S05E09 2011-11-11

Now Loading...

Leave Comment

回應

[求] 天國與地獄~瘋狂的2人#01
[求] 10:00PM TVB攜手創無限節目博覽2022[粵][PG],謝謝
感謝大家!!
[求] J2 失驚無神吊奶媽#23,謝謝
我 往時那稜角 怎麼也削掉了 被 普遍倒模複製 同化了 只相信人類 是渺小 可笑天賦已開竅 竟覺沒意義了 霎眼亦長大了 分秒生存掙扎 彷似給誰掌摑 發光的我竟怕黑 哪有晉級資格 時間早一秒一秒走 (委曲了生命太久) 誰錯失多少春與秋 想愛的 是時候仍沒然後 旁人都早已領悟透 (痛失的缺口) 任歲月流走 誰尚要 再靜候 呆等到最後有沒有內疚 (時間是對手) 而我想一秒一秒守 (忠於我一念去走) 還記得初衷不放手 當每刻 盡情就全沒遺漏 (想) 無謂得苦衷的藉口 (將多少所有) 若拼命無休 當有日回首 (苦守) 可確實發現我亦能夠 (至少我不會甘於悔疚) 奮勇地鬥 我 每樣決定裡 可否當作玩世 像 千塊骨牌堆砌 誰設計 交叉每條路 調個位 足以改變了一切 假設代價極貴 哪算什麼浪費 一秒可成天國 一秒可成醜惡 瞬間可變的太多 要信我的感覺 時間早一秒一秒走 (給屈折雙翼太久) 誰錯失多少春與秋 想愛的 是時候仍沒然後 旁人都早已領悟透 (怕高飛遠走) 任歲月流走 誰尚要 再靜候 呆等到最後有沒有內疚 (何以未仰首) 而我想一秒一秒守 (堅守我一念去走) 還記得初衷不放手 當每刻 盡情就全沒遺漏 (想) 無謂得苦衷的藉口 (將多少所有) 若拼命無休 當有日回首 (苦守) 仍慶幸有命中這惡鬥 縱 挫敗撲空 跌到 困惑迷宮 即使逼到我 太重傷 偏卻也未痛 何時終 見証 革命成功 背對 既定時空 扭轉分秒際遇我掌握去前進 誰會望通 唯有處身最黑暗中 尋遍青空 時間早一秒一秒走 時間的初衷總要守 這秒針 尚存在無限年後 其實早緊握於我手 就鬥命長久 當有日回首 可發現結局確實能夠 (抱緊每一瞬間都已夠) 以我獨有 一秒能創出宇宙
知我咩料啦
[求] Pearl 2021/11/8 9:30p.m. Why Women Kill? S2E03-04, THX
知我咩料啦
真係架 / 點解嘅 / 你好叻啊 / 傻的嗎 Icon razz
@ stevencif 咦係喎,聽日第二集都係只有日語,多謝提醒。
今次真係鳳凰不死鳥!
Why so serious?
can I be fearless?
下面全部是扮滴…
@Wai,根本沒有配音版 https://programme.tvb.com/j2/week/ 10:55AM 4分鐘的金盏菊#1[日]
下面那個是扮的, 感謝大家!!
@ stevencif 4分鐘的金盏菊#1 已下載,唔該晒。不過都想收個粵配版,隨緣地求個檔好了,thx。
我沒[求]#22, 感謝大家!!
知我咩料啦
[求] J2 失驚無神多個媽#22,謝謝
知我咩料啦
@stevencif 謝謝補檔; 另外我冇[續求]其他檔, 感謝大家!!
【求】2021/11/10 10:30PM. Jade 男神廚房 第6集   2021/11/08 10:30p.m. Pearl 靚太殺機 S2E03 04 唔該曬!
將所信諾言亦背棄 解釋也沒餘地 而相戀卻非演戲 恨纏住你 亦連累你 仍不想放開你
不知道為何沒勇氣 只知道沒權利愛你
知我咩料啦
thanks 大鱷
ah AH AH
oh oh oh
[續求] Pearl Why Women Kill Season2 #04,謝謝
[求] 鬼滅之刃 #06,07,08,09 多謝晒
我自己有錄唔需要求檔喎 11/08 靚太殺機 https://i.imgur.com/Ld5JHYu.jpg
【求】 2021/11/10 10:30PM. Jade 男神廚房 第6集,唔該曬!
[求] 2021/11/08 10:30p.m. Pearl 靚太殺機 S2E03 04,THX
[求] 11/10 美洲豹大戰巨鱷 (無綫財經 資訊台)
〔求〕2021/11/9 VIUTV 細路玩大咗 #15,唔該晒。
知我咩料啦
「求」靚太殺機第3同第4集
[求] J2 失驚無神多個媽#21,謝謝
知我咩料啦
[求] J2 鬼滅更新集數, THX
[求] Pearl 2021/11/8 9:30p.m. Why Women Kill? S2E03-04, THX
[補] J2 7/11 4分鐘的金盏菊 #1,原來只得日語 https://mega.nz/file/Ptk1jK7A#iMk_CjWNj6WjpvO7h72ARCbXhen0PHx2q72JtnMOYXM
知我咩料啦
A Vietnamese oil tanker earlier seized by Iran was free in open water Wednesday, ending the latest maritime confrontation involving Tehran amid stalled negotiations over its tattered nuclear deal with world powers. The Sothys left a position off Iran’s Bandar Abbas port and had reached international waters in the nearby Gulf of Oman early Wednesday, data analyzed by The Associated Press from MarineTraffic.com showed. The vessel appeared anchored there, but there was no information about its crew. Shahrokh Nazemi, a spokesperson for Iran’s mission to the United Nations, told the AP on Wednesday that “Sothys left Iranian waters last night after transferring the oil.” Vietnamese officials could not be reached for comment, though its officials earlier acknowledged trying to obtain more information about the seizure from Iran. The Standard Channel More>> The U.S. Navy’s Mideast-based 5th Fleet did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Iran’s powerful paramilitary Revolutionary Guard troops on Oct. 24 took control of the MV Sothys, a vessel that analysts suspect of trying to transfer sanctioned Iranian crude oil to Asia. U.S. forces had monitored the seizure but ultimately didn’t take action as the vessel sailed into Iranian waters. Iran later celebrated its capture of the vessel in dramatic footage aired on state television, the day before the 42nd anniversary of the 1979 seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The Sothys had been on the radar of United Against a Nuclear Iran, a New York-based advocacy group long suspicious of the Islamic Republic. In a letter dated Oct. 11 addressed to the Vietnam Maritime Administration, the group said its analysis of satellite photos showed the Sothys received a ship-to-ship transfer of oil in June from an oil tanker called the Oman Pride. The U.S. Treasury identified the Oman Pride in August as being used to transport Iranian oil as part of a smuggling scheme to enrich the Guard’s expeditionary Quds Force. That Iranian oil ends up being sold into East Asia, the Treasury alleged, without identifying a specific country. Iran’s seizure of the Sothys would be the latest in a string of hijackings and explosions to roil the Gulf of Oman, which sits near the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which a fifth of all traded oil passes. The U.S. Navy blamed Iran for a series of limpet mine attacks on vessels that damaged tankers in 2019, as well as for a fatal drone attack on an Israeli-linked oil tanker that killed two European crew members earlier this year. Just a few months ago, Iranian hijackers stormed and briefly captured a Panama-flagged asphalt tanker off the United Arab Emirates. Tehran denies carrying out the attacks, but a wider shadow war between Iran and the West has played out in the region’s volatile waters since then-President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from Iran’s nuclear deal in 2018 and imposed crushing sanctions on the country.
There is little doubt that scores of M+ visitors will be looking out for a highly controversial piece by mainland contemporary artist Ai Weiwei when the mega museum opens to the public next Friday. Will they find that particular piece, which features Tiananmen Square in the background? Although Betty Fung Ching Suk-yee, chief executive of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority, stopped short of answering this directly, it is only to be expected that those eager to see the exhibit - whether out of personal curiosity or for other reasons - will be disappointed. The chance of this particular piece - which features a middle-finger gesture in front of the square - seeing the light again is very slim under the current political landscape. The work was part of a collection donated by Swiss collector Uli Sigg three years ago, well before the national security law that was enforced here at midnight of June 30 last year. The Standard Channel More>> When revealed to the public by the media, the piece was immediately greeted with mixed reactions - including rounds of condemnation from pro-Beijing politicians and supporters. Although it was then permissible to be displayed publicly without fears, would Fung - a seasoned administrative officer from the government - allow it to be publicly exhibited now that the far-reaching national security law has been in force for over a year? The answer is obvious, despite Fung's witty reply to a media question that any pieces that may violate the law would not be exhibited. Nobody has concluded whether or not the Ai piece breaches the law. But no one in the cultural district authority would be prepared to take the chance after seeing many people locked up without bail pending trial under the national security law for acts that would have been okay in the past. The Ai exhibit may be an isolated case, but it is of sufficient concern to pose a dilemma that the cultural district authority will have to face in the longer term. Donations are a common way for world-class museums to acquire exhibits and it is extremely rare for a museum to cherry-pick items to accept what it likes and refuse what it doesn't. Otherwise, philanthropists would be deterred from donating to the museum, narrowing their sources of exhibits that would undermine their growth to become truly top class in the long run. So what exactly will the public see when M+ opens to them for free next week? Presumably, the exhibits will be carefully selected from the 7,700 items that the museum already has in its possession. Some may still be critical from a sociological perspective but none will be anywhere near the political red line. While Fung won't let this happen, it can be anticipated that the cautious approach will also invite criticism from some corners of society. In the SAR, the arts are not risk-free.
Australia’s highest court ruled on Wednesday that a police officer cannot use his law enforcement job as a defense against a charge of murdering an Indigenous man. The seven High Court judges unanimously agreed that Constable Zachary Rolfe could not rely on a statute that states a police officer is not “civilly or criminally liable” for performing law enforcement work “in good faith.” The ruling is a win for prosecutors who have charged Rolfe with murdering Kumanjayi Walker in a bedroom of his family home in the central Australian Indigenous township of Yuendumu on Nov. 9, 2019. Rolfe shot the 19-year-old three times during an attempted arrest. The Standard Channel More>> He could become the first police officer to be convicted in Australia of unlawfully killing an Indigenous person. Walker had stabbed Rolfe with a pair of scissors during a struggle. The murder charge relates to the second and third shots that killed Walker and that prosecutors allege were unnecessary. The High Court heard a challenge by prosecutors to the Northern Territory Supreme Court’s interpretation of defenses available to Rolfe. Five Supreme Court judges found that Rolfe could claim immunity from criminal liability under a law that protects police officers acting “in good faith in the performance or purported performance” of law enforcement duties. The judges ruled that a jury should decide whether Rolfe’s actions fitted the criteria of the immunity clause. But the High Court ruled that legal protections for police officers doing their job were “subject to constraints, such as doing only that which is reasonable and necessary.” He could defend himself with other arguments, including that he had killed Walker in self-defense or in defense of police colleagues. Rolfe, 30, has pleaded not guilty to the murder charge. He would face a potential sentence of life imprisonment if convicted. His trial had been delayed until after the High Court made its ruling. He is out on bail and lives with his parents in Canberra, the national capital where the High Court is based. He has been suspended with pay from the Northern Territory Police Force since he was charged. Walker’s death was protested at rallies around Australia that followed the death in custody of George Floyd, a Black man, in the United States last year.
Rudd, known for his starring roles in Marvel’s “Ant-Man” films, “This is 40” and “Clueless,” was revealed as this year’s winner Tuesday night on CBS’” The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.” The actor tells the magazine in an issue out Friday that some will be surprised by him receiving the honor. “I do have an awareness, enough to know that when people hear that I’d be picked for this, they would say, ‘What?’” he said. “This is not false humility. There are so many people that should get this before me.” But of course, Rudd won’t turn down the honor. He jokingly hopes the new title will grant him an invitation to “those sexy dinners” with George Clooney, Brad Pitt and Michael B. Jordan — all recent winners. The Standard Channel More>> Other past honorees include John Legend, Dwayne Johnson, Chris Hemsworth, Idris Elba, Adam Levine, Channing Tatum, and David Beckham. “I figure I’ll be on a lot more yachts,” Rudd said. “I’m excited to expand my yachting life. And I’ll probably try to get better at brooding in really soft light. I like to ponder. I think this is going to help me become more inward and mysterious. And I’m looking forward to that.” Rudd’s first major breakout performance came in the 1995′s “Clueless,” a cult classic starring Alicia Silverstone. He also made his mark in several comedies such as the “Anchorman” films, “The 40-Year-Old Virgin” and “This is 40,” a spin-off from the comedy “Knocked Up.” The actor reached superstar status in a slew of Marvel superhero films including “Ant-Man,” “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” “Captain America: Civil War” and “Avengers: Endgame.” He’ll star in the upcoming “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” and appear alongside Will Ferrell in the new Apple TV+ series “The Shrink Next Door,” which premieres Nov. 12. Rudd, 52, said his wife was initially “stupefied” after he told her the news. The couple has two kids, 17-year-old Jack and Darby, who is 12. “But you know she was very sweet about it,” he said of his wife, Julie, of 18 years. “After some giggling and shock, she said, ‘Oh, they got it right.’ And that was very sweet. She was probably not telling the truth, but what’s she going to say?” Rudd expects his circle of friends to give him “so much grief.” He won’t blame them because he would do the same. “I mean, I’m going to lean into it hard. I’m going to own this,” he said. “I’m not going to try to be like ‘Oh, I’m so modest.’ I’m getting business cards made. But all of my friends will destroy me, and I expect them to, and that’s why they’re my friends.”

頁面